Time for A Rant
There is lot of construction in Downtown Kingston. They are installing new water and sewer pipes, which were reportedly the oldest in Canada, and new roads with granite curbs! There’s no question that this was badly needed and it will look great. So great in fact, that I expect these tax-funded improvements will boost your property values … if you happen to own downtown commercial real estate.
Of course higher property values usually means higher rental rates, but can commercial rental rates go any higher?
My wife and I were interested in renting a 1200 sq foot downtown retail property when we first moved to Kingston in 2005. That is until we learned the rent was $36,000 … per month! I was in such disbelief I had to ask three times. Yes, that is per month, not a misprint. That kind of money gets you street-level retail space in Manhattan, even on Broadway! What could possibly explain such high rates in a small town like Kingston?
I am told that downtown Kingston was fairly run down before amalgamation. In fact, one long-term resident of Kingston East recently told me that the cash win-fall from the larger tax base was responsible for fixing up the downtown. That may have boosted property values substantially, along with retail rental rates; quite a gift from the townships to the downtown landlords. Yet, even with this win-fall of tax dollars from amalgamation, downtown businesses are closing faster than they can raise our taxes. Are we just enriching the already wealthy downtown landlords a second time? They certainly seem immune to the lost rental income from closing businesses. Enormous wealth will do that.
I will enjoy the beautiful new downtown streets, granite curbs and all; the work crews are certainly doing a great job. With any luck one of the restaurants will survive so my wife and I can get a snack after we stroll passed a few blocks of “For Lease” signs in the vacant windows.
In spite of our very high property taxes, Kingston was rated one of Canada’s worst run cities by Macleans magazine last summer (http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/16/canadas-best-and-worst-run-cities). We barely beat out Charlottetown PEI for last spot!
Even in Brockville, where property taxes are much lower, they pick up your Christmas tree; there is a spring cleaning pickup where they’ll take away anything you put out; they don’t reject your recycling because the cardboard isn’t bundled to code or there’s a tomato stain in an empty can of tomatoes, god forbid; and when I lived in Brockville, my water bill was less than half of what I now must pay.
We need to wake up in the East. Our taxes are being given away and the third crossing is just a false promise to keep us quiet.
We are paying over $100,000 per year to more than 50 public employees for nearly the worst service in Canada. They work for us. If this was a real business, they’d be fired. And that’s what secession means. It’s time to fire our underperforming employee – the City of Kingston. Can you imagine what we could do in the East if we could spend our tax dollars here?
By: Steve Brule










Hey Steve, Good to hear a fellow Kingston East question taxes vs services. Since amalgamation was supposed to streamline and reduce costs,how about an independent study before vs after. Include in study; what is formula for calc. taxes given services being uploaded, downloaded, mpac impact and general budget increases”, “what are the limitations of our representative on Council given the outnumbering by City councillors and recent east unfavorable decisions,”how much tax is included in that $36,000. given that a declining downtown is particular east detrimental” “was the east considered in the study that put the LVEC in our traffic pattern to the Downtown or that the east may require parking if attending an event” “how is the east affected in the consistent poor results obtained by Kingston in the Provincial enforced annual Municipal Comparison Study, “does other councillors resent the holding back of the funds currently held in the Pittsburgh benefit fund and does this effect decisions when allocating project funding”.
In my view, it is time for a full evaluation of the amalgamation project and the seemingly negative effects inherited by Pittsburgh Township.
Hi Cliff,
You make many excellent points. I’m not sure who could do the follow up study that you suggest, but my understanding is that amalgamation was not exactly an open and fair process, and that a bridge was also promised at the time.
Personally I don’t think we are getting value for our high tax dollars.
Leave your response!
Calendar
Archives
Recent News
Recent Comments